About Matt Killorin

I'm a comic book and movie fan residing in beautiful Richmond, Virginia, where I live by the maxim "What would Adam West do?".

Super Powered Film: Matthew Killorin reviews Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

Note: This article was previously published on Capes on Film.

If you’re willing to put your brain in neutral and lower your IQ about fifty points, you might have a good time at Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (SoV). While I don’t think the filmmakers will have to worry about renting a tux when award season rolls around, it wasn’t the disaster that many other critics seem to think. It ranged from outright ridiculous in spots (What action movie isn’t?) to actually kinda cool. I went into the theatre expecting a leaner, meaner, grungier take on the Ghost Rider franchise than the 2007 film, and for the most part, that’s what I got. If you’re expecting a groundbreaking, profound piece of cinema, stay far, far away. However, if you’re the type of person who enjoys watching old, cheesy horror or action movies and appreciates them as visual spectacles – nothing more, nothing less – then maybe you’ll dig it. I have to chuckle when I read reviews bemoaning the lack of character development and the silly dialogue in SoV. Come on, we’re talking about a ninety minute movie based on a comic book character with a flaming skeleton as an alter ego, and you want character development? Screw that – The Rider has asphalt to melt and evildoers to flame-broil.

Nicolas Cage – Sony Pictures

To put it bluntly, SoV is not as awful as many would have you believe, given that co-directors, Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor, had a budget of around $75 million, which is almost half the budget that Mark Steven Johnson had for the first Ghost Rider film. These days, it’s almost unheard of for a major comic book movie to be made for under $100 million. Neveldine and Taylor made good use of their meager budget by filming in interesting (and I’m sure, cheap) locations in Romania and Turkey – full of ancient ruins and abandoned industrial facilities – which definitely gives the movie an eerie look. There are also two major action scenes that they nail – one in which The Rider commandeers a giant bulldozer of some kind, and the climactic chase featuring The Rider against a convoy of armored cars. What the movie lacks in a coherent story or believable dialogue, it at least makes up for with sheer heavy metal destruction. The directors also gave Cage free rein to be as nutso as he wanted, and he delivered – with a whacked out performance that bordered on self-parody. There are several over-the-top Cage freak-outs that will surely become YouTube classics.

The overall story is really the weakest part of SoV. It’s a plot that’s been used in horror movies for decades, and I have a feeling it took the screenwriter, David Goyer, all of two weeks to write it. Tell me if you’ve heard this one before – A special child is needed by a cult in order to make a sacrifice to Satan, and if that occurs, “a darkness will fall upon the earth” (someone actually says that in the film). Johnny Blaze (Cage) is recruited to save the kid (Fergus Riordan), many chase scenes then follow, and the Ghost Rider snuffs a lot of bad guys. That pretty much sums up the storyline of SoV. By the way, these demonic possession stories always seem to involve some secret sect of “the church”, and sure enough, SoV has one of those, too. Without a doubt, the cliche-filled plot was the weakest part of the movie and definitely could’ve used a few more original ideas.

While the re-hashed plot was disappointing, SoV has three things going for it. First, the visual effects people improved on the look of the Ghost Rider from the first film – with thick, black smoke trailing him, and a more realistic motorcycle, he’s less flash and more fire and brimstone. Next, the supporting cast is good, and considering the mediocre script, should be given credit for putting in solid performances. The stunning Violante Placido (The American, 2011) plays the mother of the boy whom the bad guys are after, and seemed right at home amidst all the carnage (she can handle a sniper rifle, as well). Yes, she’s there strictly as eye candy, but I have to admit, the close-ups on her flawless features were almost worth the price of admission. Idris Elba (Thor, 2011) also looked like he was having fun playing a mysterious motorcycle-riding monk named Moreau, and through sheer talent gave his character some depth despite having a non-existent backstory.

Finally, Cage himself – I think it’s obvious that Nic knows people like to see him go batshit crazy and he has several scenes in which he does just that. Yes, go ahead and call it terrible over-acting, but when you’re watching a movie based on a completely ludicrous concept, Cage’s histrionics seem appropriate. So, the final verdict is - Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance gets a few things right, but in the end is just mediocre. It can’t rise above its cliche-ridden plot and dumb dialogue, and it’s simply not as good as it could’ve been.While I liked parts of it, I believe only hardcore Ghost Rider fans will enjoy this ride.

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

Directed by Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor.Screenplay by David S. Goyer, Seth Hoffman and Scott Gimple. Based on Ghost Rider by Marvel Comics. Studio – Hyde Park Entertainment. Distributed by Columbia Pictures. Release date – February 17, 2012.

Cast

Nicolas Cage as Johnny Blaze/Ghost Rider

Johnny Whitworth as Ray Carrigan/Blackout

Fergus Riordan as Danny

Ciarán Hinds as The Devil/Roarke

Violante Placido as Nadya

Idris Elba as Moreau

Christopher Lambert as Methodius

Super Powered Film: ‘Chronicle’ Stars Talk New Superhero Flick

One thing we learned in 2011 was that a low budget, independent movie can make a ton of money at the box office with little advertising. The Devil Inside proved that when it made $34.5 million on its opening weekend. Trying to follow in The Devil’s footsteps is Chronicle when it opens this Friday (Feb. 3). Is it going to be the big surprise hit of the winter movie season, or will it bomb? It’s getting a lot of internet buzz and from everything we’ve heard about the flick, at the very least it promises to be a fresh spin on the superhero movie genre. However, Chronicle is not based on a comic book franchise, and other than Hancock (2008), I can’t recall a successful superhero movie based on an original character.

In an earlier post, we talked about the trailer and how the movie was made in the “found footage” style. It stars three relatively unknown actors and it’s the first major film for its director Josh Trank. If you want to hear Trank talk about filming in South Africa and meet his three leads - Michael B. JordanDane Dehaan, and Alex Russell, check out the video below, courtesy of SuperHeroHype.

I’m interested to hear if other people around the world are getting excited for this movie. If you’re in the UK or Ireland and see it before the USA opening, hit us up in the comments and give your verdict.

 

 

Super Powered Film: What’s up with ‘The Wolverine’?

The Wolverine is a movie that’s been on the radar for at least two years, but we really haven’t heard much about it lately. Originally, filming was supposed to start in the spring of 2011, but it was delayed because of natural disasters in Japan, where many scenes were going to be filmed. The start date was then pushed to the fall of 2011, but a schedule conflict for star, Hugh Jackman, nixed those plans. (Jackman signed onto the musical version of Les Miserables.)

If you recall, about this time last year, the movie had another delay.  A year ago, fans were going nuts over the announcement that Darren Aronofsky (The WrestlerBlack Swan) had been hired to direct, and then in March he left the project. The search for a new director put the movie on the back burner for a few months, but then Fox hired James Mangold (Girl, Interrupted - Walk the Line) in June 2011. Recently, I’ve been wondering if the movie was already filming or if any start date had been announced. So, after doing a search for the latest news, it sounds like summer of this year is when the cameras might finally roll. That’s according to statements from the film’s producer, Lauren Shuler Donner, but she stresses that it’s all up to Jackman’s schedule. The movie’s IMDb page has 2013 as the only info regarding when it will open.

If you’re not quite up to speed on The Wolverine, here’s a little info -

The movie is not a sequel to 2009′s X-Men Origins: Wolverine. It’s going to be a stand-alone story in which Logan/Wolverine travels to Japan to search for the truth behind his origin. It’s at least partially based on the classic 1982 comic book run by Chris Claremont and Frank Miller. In that story, Wolverine also tries to win back the woman he loves while battling her samurai sword-wielding family. Will that part of the story be included? Nobody knows, yet.

Here’s how Mangold described the movie to MTV News -

“I was just really intrigued by the script and the project and the boldness of making a really personal Wolverine movie. But it’s also more of a journey for the character in a completely foreign land and more of a mystery and an adventure than it kind of is another save the world X-Men film.”

Some information in this article can be found at

http://screenrant.com/wolverine-2-release-date-rob-121675/

http://www.reelz.com/person/120691/james-mangold/news/

Super Powered Film: Does Avengers have a mystery villain?

 

Tom Hiddlestone as Loki

We all know Thor’s seriously disturbed and vengeful brother, Loki, is the main villain in Marvel’s The Avengers - but will he have help wreaking destruction on the world? According to an article on Heat Vision, he just might. Seems a previously seen baddie from another Marvel movie is going to raise his ugly mug again in the battle against Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor.

As often happens with superhero movies, the merchandisers start promoting their products and inadvertently giving away spoilers long before the movie opens, and that’s the case here. It looks like a toy company has released a promo that shows the (up until now) surprise villain in The Avengers.

If the report is accurate, this is a big spoiler, but if you can’t stand the suspense, check the rest of the post after the jump.

(more…)

Super Powered Film: 1920s Zorro Film as an Early Superhero Influence


This week, I’ve been reading Comic Book Comics, which is a history of comic books in, you guessed it, comic book form. It’s published by Evil Twin Comics and is available in both paper and digital format. Why am I telling you this, you ask. To begin with, I think it’s a very well-written series of books (six in all) and deserves a plug. Besides that, it spurred me to think about the early days of comics, because it does a great job of explaining the timeline of how comics as we know them today, came into being, and a part of that history involves Hollywood.

The author, Fred Van Lente, points out the influence that one movie in particular had on the creation of the first comic book superhero – of course, that being Superman. Van Lente pulls together all of the things that influenced Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, Superman’s creators, in the early 1930s – such as Philip Wylie’s novel Gladiator and Edgar Rice Burroughs’ John Carter of Mars books. However, the one film that Van Lente includes as a major inspiration for Superman is 1920′s The Mark of Zorro, starring Douglas Fairbanks. In just a few panels, Van Lente and artist, Ryan Dunlavey, explain how Fairbanks, after reading Johnston McCulley’s 1919 novella, The Curse of Capistrano, created the screen version of Don Diego Vega and his heroic alter ego Zorro. They point out that Fairbanks came up with Zorro’s signature “Z” sword mark, which was similar to Superman’s “S”. Another Zorro element that Van Lente contends was adapted by Siegel and Shuster was Zorro’s “populist class consciousness”.

So, why is this bit of comic book/movie history important? I can think of two reasons. First, it highlights the earliest example of what I like to call the “symbiotic relationship” between film and comic books. The more I study the history of comic books, the more convinced I am that movies have influenced the medium in ways that many fans aren’t aware of. For example, I recall reading how Citizen Kane (1941) inspired some of the legendary comic book artists to try new techniques in order to emulate Orson Welles’ classic film. Now, it’s like we’ve come full circle – comic book-inspired films are dominating the box office, so the comic book half of this pop culture beast is influencing the film half.
While I’m on the subject of comics and movies, I’ll throw this question up for debate – If we slightly stretch the definition of what a superhero is, could we consider The Mark of Zorro the first superhero movie?  I admit, except for the clip below, I haven’t seen the film, but from descriptions I’ve read, it wouldn’t be out of place in a collection of other films in the superhero genre – a lone hero with highly honed fighting skills, a mask and costume, an identifying symbol (the “Z”), a secret identity, fighting for the oppressed…sure sounds like a superhero. I know, I know, Zorro is considered a “pulp adventure hero”,  but it’s interesting to look at that 1920 movie and wonder how much impact it had on Siegel and Shuster, and other early superhero creators. Have you ever thought about these early influences on Golden Age comic book writers? If you have any opinions on the subject, feel free to start a discussion in the comments.

Now, the second reason I think it’s important to re-consider The Mark of Zorro in the context of comic books – it reminds us of how nothing is created in a cultural vacuum. As Van Lente and Dunlavey show, even the greatest superhero of all was an amalgamation of elements from at least half a dozen creations that had come before. I think it’s good to bring this up sometimes, because I often hear critics complaining about how this movie or that book seems similar to a previous one. I always like to make a clear distinction between something that’s draws inspiration from a previous work and an outright copy. Of course, that opens the door to a debate about all the characters that Superman has “inspired” over the decades, and that is a debate we’ll save for another post. Until next time…
  • Copyright Notice

    Super Powered Fiction and all material on the site is copyright © 2010-2013 Nicholas Ahlhelm unless otherwise noted. Individual articles copyright © their respective authors.